Need for an international development cooperation agency

[ad_1]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

INTERNATIONAL

  • GS-2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

Need for an international development cooperation agency

Context Enhancing the efficacy of India’s development cooperation endeavours has been a challenging issue for the past several decades. The country, therefore, needs to expedite work on a specialised agency for efficient delivery of outcomes.

Development assistance and lack of institutional foundation

  • In the last two years, India’s assistance to other developing countries has multiplied several times.
  • India’s development cooperation has five modalities — capacity building, concessional finance, technology sharing, grant and trade wherein duty-free and quota-free access to the Indian market is provided.
  • India’s helpful image yields goodwill globally, but quality project delivery is yet to become the country’s USP.
  • On average, India provides development assistance of $6.48 billion and receives assistance of $6.09 billion annually from key partners .
  • Under Indian Cooperation Mission (ICM) — India partners for development cooperation and does not give aid like OECD members.
  • India has been supporting the developmental endeavours of several partner countries in Africa and Asia, even before Independence.
  • However, this process lacks a firm institutional foundation.

Efforts to form an institutional framework

  • The first effort by India to shape a framework was in 2003 with the announcement of the India Development Initiative (IDI).
  • Subsequently, the Indian Development and Economic Assistance Scheme (IDEAS) was launched in 2005 for managing credit lines.
  • The IDI was suspended in 2007 and the setting up of the India International Development Cooperation Agency (IIDCA) never took off.
  • Meanwhile, in 2018, China founded its international development cooperation agency.

Changes in concessional financing

  • At this point, concessional financing in India’s development cooperation portfolio is close to 70%.
  • In 2015, the government made efforts to bring in operational changes in the way credit lines work.

 Way forward

  • Countries have sovereign and non-sovereign windows for promoting infrastructure financing abroad — both have their own place.
  • A non-sovereign window would provide greater flexibility and bandwidth.
  • To become a leading strategic investor in commercially viable and financially attractive public-private partnership infrastructure projects, the fund may build an investment ecosystem in Africa with support from leading Indian firms.
  • The proposed new entity may also provide handholding to select performing Indian social enterprises to operate in other countries as well.
  • Besides making an immediate economic impact, these enterprises can facilitate development partnerships between India and other countries.

Conclusion

  • It is high time India restructures its development finance apparatus for deeper and effective engagement and to address the rapidly evolving newer competitive development financing landscape.



[ad_2]

Leave a Comment