[ad_1]
GS Paper 3:
Topics Covered: Role of external state and non-state actors in creating challenges to internal security.
Context:
Following the recent killings, several tribal outfits in Tripura have joined hands to push their demand for a separate state for indigenous communities in the region, arguing that their “survival and existence” was at stake.
The Demand:
The parties are demanding a separate state of ‘Greater Tipraland’ for the indigenous communities of the north-eastern state. They want the Centre to carve out the separate state under Article 2 and 3 of the Constitution.
What is Greater Tipraland?
‘Greater Tipraland’ is essentially an extension of the ruling tribal partner Indigenous Peoples Front of Tripura – IPFT’s demand of Tipraland, which sought a separate state for tribals of Tripura.
- The new demand seeks to include every tribal person living in indigenous area or village outside the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (TTAADC) under the proposed model.
- However, the idea doesn’t restrict to simply the Tripura tribal council areas, but seeks to include ‘Tiprasa’ of Tripuris spread across different states of India like Assam, Mizoram etc. as well, even those living in Bandarban, Chittagong, Khagrachari and other bordering areas of neighbouring Bangladesh.
What’s the issue?
Regional political parties say the call of Greater Tipraland’ rose due to unfulfilled demands of revising NRC in Tripura and opposition to CAA in the past.
Insta Curious:
Did you know that Article 2 of the Constitution deals with admission or establishment of new states? Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions, as it thinks fit.
InstaLinks:
Prelims Link:
- About Greater Tipraland.
- About NRC.
- What is CAA?
Sources: the Hindu.
[ad_2]