[ad_1]
Topic: Case study.
7. You are the S.P of a district. There was a peaceful protest organised in your district against unemployment and demand for jobs. But suddenly, the protest took a violent turn and some miscreants indulged in arson, vandalising government property like trains, buses and pelting stones on policemen in which 2 constables were severely injured.
They very next day some of the miscreants were identified and the higher ups ordered you to raze some ‘illegal’ constructions belonging to the accused. On reaching one such spot, you ascertained that few of these said constructions were not illegal but were legitimate having all relevant documents. On conveying the same to the higher ups, they instructed you carry on with the demolition nevertheless.
(a) What are the options available in front of you? Evaluate their pros and cons
(b) Which course of action will you take? Justify.
(c) Is this case an example of the administration being the ‘judge, jury and executioner’? Debate
Difficulty Level: Moderate
Why the question:
The question is part of the static syllabus of General studies paper – 4 and part of ‘Case Study Fridays’ in Mission-2023 Secure.
Structure of the answer:
Introduction:
Begin by giving context and enumerate the stakeholders.
Body:
First, write about various options available to you and write pros and cons of each.
Next, in detail explain the course of action you will take and justify it ethically.
Next, discuss both sides regarding the nature of above case study and the administration being ‘judge, jury and executioner’
Conclusion:
Give a concise summation of your views to conclude the answer.
[ad_2]